<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cath Lab Today &#187; and-clinical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cathlabtoday.com/tag/and-clinical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cathlabtoday.com</link>
	<description>News and Discussion for the Cath Lab &#124; a division of mmhc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:27:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery PCI in Acute Myocardial Infarction</title>
		<link>http://www.cathlabtoday.com/2010/09/unprotected-left-main-coronary-artery-pci-in-acute-myocardial-infarction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cathlabtoday.com/2010/09/unprotected-left-main-coronary-artery-pci-in-acute-myocardial-infarction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CLT Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cath Lab Articles Open Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and-clinical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[associated-with]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[given-the-data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical-therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outcomes-with]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patients-with]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stenting-may]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cathlabtoday.com/2010/09/unprotected-left-main-coronary-artery-pci-in-acute-myocardial-infarction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The standard of care for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease is coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) based largely on older, outdated data which demonstrate improved survival as compared with medical therapy and poor outcomes with balloon angioplasty.(1-3) However, given the data which demonstrate that ULMCA percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) is safe and effective, the 2009 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) focused guidelines for PCI state that ULMCA stenting may be considered in patients with anatomic conditions that are associated with a low risk of procedural complications and clinical conditions that predict an increased risk of adverse surgical outcomes.(4) read more 


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p> &#84;&#104;&#101; standard &#111;&#102; care &#102;&#111;&#114; patients &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; unprotected &#108;&#101;&#102;&#116; main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease &#105;&#115; coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) based largely &#111;&#110; older, outdated data &#119;&#104;&#105;&#99;&#104; demonstrate improved survival &#97;&#115; compared &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; medical therapy &#97;&#110;&#100; poor outcomes &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; balloon angioplasty.(1-3) &#66;&#117;&#116;, given &#116;&#104;&#101; data &#119;&#104;&#105;&#99;&#104; demonstrate &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; ULMCA percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; drug-eluting stents (DES) &#105;&#115; safe &#97;&#110;&#100; effective, &#116;&#104;&#101; 2009 American College &#111;&#102; Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) focused guidelines &#102;&#111;&#114; PCI state &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; ULMCA stenting &#109;&#97;&#121; &#98;&#101; considered &#105;&#110; patients &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; anatomic conditions &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; &#97;&#114;&#101; associated &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; &#97; low risk &#111;&#102; procedural complications &#97;&#110;&#100; clinical conditions &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; predict &#97;&#110; increased risk &#111;&#102; adverse surgical outcomes.(4) read &#109;&#111;&#114;&#101; </p>
<p>&#84;&#104;&#101; rest &#105;&#115; here:<br />
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.cathlabtoday.com/goto/Unprotected_Left_Main_Coronary_Artery_PCI_105_110_Acute_Myocardial_Infarction/196/1" title="Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery PCI &#105;&#110; Acute Myocardial Infarction">Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery PCI &#105;&#110; Acute Myocardial Infarction</a></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cathlabtoday.com/2010/09/unprotected-left-main-coronary-artery-pci-in-acute-myocardial-infarction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outcomes of Unselected Recipients of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: The Cypher® Stent U.S. Post-Marketing Surveillance Registry</title>
		<link>http://www.cathlabtoday.com/2010/02/outcomes-of-unselected-recipients-of-sirolimus-eluting-stents-the-cypher%c2%ae-stent-u-s-post-marketing-surveillance-registry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cathlabtoday.com/2010/02/outcomes-of-unselected-recipients-of-sirolimus-eluting-stents-the-cypher%c2%ae-stent-u-s-post-marketing-surveillance-registry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CLT Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cath Lab News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[067-patients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-year-safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[12-month-follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and-clinical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[objective-]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[original contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety-and]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[were-carried]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[were-compared]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[were-implanted]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathlabtoday.com/2010/02/outcomes-of-unselected-recipients-of-sirolimus-eluting-stents-the-cypher%c2%ae-stent-u-s-post-marketing-surveillance-registry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ ABSTRACT: Objective. To examine the 1-year safety and clinical outcomes associated with the post-marketing early unselected use of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in the United States


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p> ABSTRACT: Objective. &#84;&#111; examine &#116;&#104;&#101; 1-year safety &#97;&#110;&#100; clinical outcomes associated &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; &#116;&#104;&#101; post-marketing early unselected &#117;&#115;&#101; &#111;&#102; sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) &#105;&#110; &#116;&#104;&#101; United States</p>
<p>See &#116;&#104;&#101; original post here:<br />
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.cathlabtoday.com/goto/Outcomes_of_Unselected_Recipients_of_Sirolimus_Eluting_Stents_The_Cypher_Stent_U_S_Post_Marketing_Surveillance_Registry/74/1" title="Outcomes &#111;&#102; Unselected Recipients &#111;&#102; Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: &#84;&#104;&#101; Cypher® Stent U.S. Post-Marketing Surveillance Registry">Outcomes &#111;&#102; Unselected Recipients &#111;&#102; Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: &#84;&#104;&#101; Cypher® Stent U.S. Post-Marketing Surveillance Registry</a></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cathlabtoday.com/2010/02/outcomes-of-unselected-recipients-of-sirolimus-eluting-stents-the-cypher%c2%ae-stent-u-s-post-marketing-surveillance-registry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

